Quackbase!
A database that tracks dubious medical claims.
Response number: 76
Responder: ASASA
Date of response: Sept. 20, 2011
Type of response: Ruling
Solal again appealed the ASA decision in favour of the Sugar Association. The ASA has ruled against Solal's new appeal.
Claims dealt with in this response
Documents relevant to this claim
Description
In this long-running saga, following the Sugar Association's complaint to the ASA that Solal's claims in its advertisements for its "Naturally Sweet" and "Stevia Sweet" products were misleading, Solal again appealed the ASA's decision in favour of the Sugar Association. The ASA has ruled against Solal's new appeal.